Implementing the Eurocodes

 

This section discusses some of the issues related to implementing Eurocodes in a company, specifically:

  • Obtaining the Eurocodes
  • Comparison with existing design codes
  • Physical use of the Eurocodes
  • Internal resources

Obtaining the Eurocodes

The Eurocodes are published by the standards organisations of each EU member country. Some publish them in more than one language (generally English is included) and the prices vary between countries.

The ISO website has a list of most of the world's standards organisations, and by some judicious research it is possible to cut the cost, although knowledge of the local language is often helpful. We sourced ours through Hungary, where they are available in electronic format (.pdf) and copyright allowing multiple copies for the purchaser. There may be even better options. It is worth noting that some countries put a premium on an English version (for example, Germany increases the price by about 70% to bring its price in line with the BSi).

The status of the UK versions the Eurocodes and their National Annexes is available from the BSi website.

The status of other countries' implementation can be found by following the links on our Links page


Comparison with Existing Design Codes

It is always useful to compare a well understood design in both the current design code and the new one, since this gives confidence that the new one still gives results that meet engineering extectations. Usually such comparisons show areas where design assumptions are either more or less conservative. Bestech have compared the design of precast pretensioned beams to both the British standards and the Eurocodes, and the results are remarkably similar ... please click here for the details of this study.


Physical Use of the Eurocodes

The Eurocodes have been drafted such that information is available from a single source only. This avoids potential errors and inconsistencies but does mean that much cross referencing is necessary. Even for the design of a simple reinforced concrete bridge you need simultaneous access to six Eurocodes and their National Annexes (EN 1990 & EN 1990/A1, Basis of Design: EN 1991-1 and EN 1991-2, General Actions and Traffic Actions: and EN1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2, Concrete Structures). For steel and concrete composite bridges the number of documents required is more than double this. Add to this the National Annex documents, and maybe a Design Guide, and adequate desk space may become an issue.

One of the ways to help an engineer become familiar with new design codes is to use Eurocode design software such as Sam whose on-line Help system points out the relevant Eurocode clauses.

Examples of these benefits are given on our section on Training.


Internal Resources

Consider designating one person to become a Eurocode expert who can be a centre of knowledge for the company. Many companies have identified such a person already. They will be the people who make it their business to solve code interpretation problems and finding the answers to general queries. Do not be tempted to write an in-house commentary as these already exist as Design Guides, for example:

  • Hendy C.R., Johnson R.P (2006), Designers' Guide to EN 1994-2, Steel and Concrete Composite Bridges, Thomas Telford, ISBN: 0727731610
  • Hendy C.R., Murphy C.J (2007), Designers' Guide to EN 1993-2, Steel Bridges, Thomas Telford, ISBN: 0727731602
  • Hendy C.R., Smith D.A (2007), Designers' Guide to EN 1992-2, Concrete Bridges, Thomas Telford, ISBN: 0727731599
  • See also the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission publications.

(All available through Thomas Telford and there are certainly others as well.)

This is another area where good Eurocode design software such as SAM can play a role. Very often a query arises as the result of doing a design, and the detail provided in the software's calculation output will often be able either to give the answer directly, or to point to the relevant part of the Eurocode. This shields the in-house Eurocode expert from the day-to-day questions, and leaves time available for more important issues.

Another aspect to which much thought should be given is that of training. Effective and timely training will have a significant impact on the cost of implementation. We show on the page on Training how this is so, and offer guidance on effective ways to minimise this cost.

Finally, it is worthwhile planning the initial project to be carried out, designed using the Eurocodes. A typical project that is totally familiar in all other respects will ensure that the use of a novel design code will have the minimum impact on the success of the project delivery. It may even be considered helpful to do two parallel designs, or to redesign an existing project to the new codes. 'Maximise the familiar and minimise the novel' should be the mantra. This mantra should also be applied to the choice of software. If the currently used software tools have been updated by their suppliers, use them - it cuts out another layer of unfamiliarity. If the current methods use in-house software developed over a period of years, or software not available for Eurocodes, consider the benefits of SAM, and integrated Eurocode / Software Training.